Todays Ethical Delimas With Immgration Reform in the United States Peer Reviewed Journals
President Trump's Executive Orders on Clearing and Refugees
President Trump signed iii executive orders the calendar week of January 23 which offend the dignity and threaten the rights of immigrants and refugees both in the U.s.a. and globally. On January 25 at the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Trump signed executive orders on border security and interior enforcement. On Jan 27, he signed an executive order at the Pentagon on refugees and visa holders from designated nations.
Executive Gild on Border Security
The executive order on edge security, entitled "Edge Security and Clearing Enforcement Improvements," contains several sections which undermine man rights, including the expanded use of detention, limits on access to asylum, enhanced enforcement along the US-Mexico border, and the structure of a 2,000 mile border wall.
Structure of a Border Wall and Additional Border Patrol Personnel
Department 4 of the edge security executive order directs DHS to take steps to obtain operational control of the United states of america-United mexican states border by planning, designing and constructing a wall along the length of the edge. Information technology also directs DHS to allocate unused funding for the purpose of amalgam a wall and to undertake a comprehensive study on the security of the southern edge inside 180 days. Department 8 directs DHS to hire an additional 5,000 Border Patrol agents "as shortly as practicable."
Response:The construction of a border wall was a main hope of Trump'southward presidential entrada, despite concerns by experts that the wall would be expensive, difficult to construct, ineffective in deterring illegal migration, harmful to the environment on the edge, offensive to personal property rights, and a threat to the economical and social well-being of border communities. President Trump's hope to force Mexico to pay for a wall has created intense tensions in the relationship between these hitherto allied nations.
Adding 5,000 more Border Patrol agents along the border would increase the number of agents to virtually 25,000, more than triple the number of agents in 2000. The executive order does non explain why the additional agents are needed.
Increased Construction of Detention Facilities and Detention of Immigrants
Section five of the club directs DHS to immediately construct detention facilities at or nearly the southern edge and to assign asylum officers and immigration judges to the facilities to behave asylum interviews and hearings. Section half-dozen directs DHS to detain noncitizens to the extent permitted past police and to issue guidance on detention authority to stop "catch and release."
Response: The executive order does not specify the source of funding for the structure of detention facilities, which tin toll tens of millions of dollars, money which will become to individual detention companies.
The employ of detention for asylum-seekers has been shown to limit their access to due procedure. This policy would also crave the detention of women and children, which has been challenged in court. The utilize of alternatives to detention, particularly community-based models involving nongovernmental organizations, has proven to be more than humane, cost-effective, and beneficial to the court organisation. These programs likewise afford immigrants ameliorate access to counsel and to know your rights presentations.
Limiting Access to Asylum
Section xi of the order directs DHS to expand expedited removal throughout the country, as opposed to within 100 miles of the border; to employ humanitarian parole authority only on a "instance by case" basis; to railroad train all DHS personnel on the unaccompanied conflicting children section of the Trafficking Victims Protection and Reauthorization Act (TVPRA); and to ensure that credible fright determinations for those in expedited removal or "reasonable fear" determinations for those in reinstatement of removal proceedings are conducted within the "plain language of the provisions."
Response:Studies accept shown that expedited removal is often applied incorrectly by enforcement personnel and that asylum-seekers are non allowed to adequately communicate their fearfulness in such situations or, fifty-fifty if they do express fright, are only denied a credible fear interview, leading to their return and peril. The preparation of DHS personnel on child provisions is needed, but should be conducted past child welfare experts, who also should assistance border patrol in making those determinations. Assessments should be made of all children, including Mexican children.
Executive Order on Interior Enforcement
The second immigration-related executive order, entitled, "Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United states of america," focuses on such issues as sanctuary cities and local-federal clearing enforcement cooperation, enforcement priorities, the reinstatement of the Secure Communities programme and Section 287(grand) agreements, and an increase in the number of ICE agents.
Sanctuary Cities and Local-Federal Clearing Enforcement
Section ix forbids "sanctuary" jurisdictions from receiving federal grants, except those that are necessary for enforcement purposes. Information technology directs DHS to designate jurisdictions equally "sanctuary" jurisdictions, although there is no definition of what constitutes a "sanctuary." Section 8 directs DHS to enter into Section 287(g) agreements, which permit state and local law enforcement to act as immigration agents and to apprehend and detain immigrants. Section 10 terminates the Priority Enforcement Program (PEP), instituted past the Obama Assistants, and re-institutes the Secure Communities program, which would require local jurisdictions to issue "detainers" on unauthorized immigrants in their custody.
Response: Many large cities, such every bit New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago, likewise equally smaller cities and communities, have chosen non to cooperate with federal authorities in enforcing clearing laws, including participation in the Secure Communities and Section 287(g) programs. The executive order will penalize these jurisdictions if they continue not to participate by withholding federal grant coin, except money for "enforcement" purposes. This presumes that other funding, such as Community Block grants, could be withheld. To date, cities such equally Chicago and New York take stated that they volition continue to not cooperate with federal regime on clearing enforcement considering they have no legal grounds to hold apprehended person beyond a limited period and because they depend upon the cooperation of immigrant communities to "protect and serve" the public.
Secure Communities and Section 287(chiliad), launched during the George W. Bush assistants, take been criticized as eroding cooperation between local law enforcement officials and immigrants and their communities, which would exist hesitant to report crimes to law enforcement officials who could detain and behave them. Under the Secure Communities program, immigrants with minor offenses, such as loitering, have been deported. Nether Section 287(m), local enforcement officials, untrained in clearing law, accept repeatedly violated the civil rights of legal residents.
Enforcement Priorities
Section five expands the priority listing of noncitizens discipline to deportation to anyone charged of a criminal offense, who committed acts that constitute a criminal offense, who engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation, who has abused any program related to public benefits, who is subject to a concluding order of removal, but has not departed, or who otherwise poses a run a risk to public safety.
Response: Despite the vow by President Trump to prioritize criminals for deportation, the executive order is then broad that anyone who committed even a minor offense, such every bit a traffic violation or jaywalking, could be deported. The order besides applies to those who may accept misrepresented their condition to obtain piece of work. In lodge to carry out the president'due south pledge to bear 2-3 meg persons he deems equally criminals, the Trump administration would need to significantly increase the number of ICE agents and conduct nationwide raids and sweeps.
Increase in Water ice Agents
Department vii authorizes an increase of x,000 additional Water ice agents.
Response: Such an increase would triple the number of ICE agents at a cost of $3.nine billion, likely in anticipation of the launching of more aggressive enforcement activity throughout the country, including raids, which spread fear in immigrant communities.
Combined, the two executive orders on immigration enforcement provide a blueprint to use all available resources and dominance to deport as many undocumented persons as possible. This would no doubt pb to an unprecedented separation of families, including families with US-citizen children.
Executive Guild on Refugees
On January 27, President Trump signed an executive order entitled, "Protecting the Nation from Terrorist Attacks by Foreign Nationals." The order suspends the issuance of visas to nationals from Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Great socialist people's libyan arab jamahiriya, Somalia, and Republic of yemen; shuts downward the The states refugee program for 120 days; reduces the number of refugees to be admitted to the Us in FY 2017 from 110,000 to l,000; halts the resettlement of Syrian refugees indefinitely; launches a screening mechanism for the entry of foreign nationals; and requires DHS to expedite completion of an entry-get out tracking organization.
Suspension of Visas to Certain Countries and Extreme Vetting
Department 3 of the executive society suspends the issuance of visas to countries designated as being detrimental to the interests of the United States for xc days, listing Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen. Department 4 requires implementation of compatible screening standards for all clearing programs, to include assessments such as whether an private is a risk, will exist a positive contributor to the nation, and has the ability to brand contributions in the national interest.
Response: The countries listed for pause of visas are Muslim-majority, while other nations that have experienced terrorism have non been listed. This suggests that the executive order is targeting Muslim immigrants. While some countries are listed, others, such equally Saudi Arabia, are excluded, even though the ix/11 hijackers originated from that land. The implementation of a screening program in Department 4 is subjective and could lead to discrimination against certain religions and persons of certain income levels.
Suspension of the US Refugee Plan and the Ban on Syrian Refugees
Section five of the executive order suspends the US resettlement program for 120 days while a review is made to ensure that refugees are existence fairly screened for national security purposes. The program will be restored simply if the Secretarial assistant of State, the Secretary of DHS, and the Director of National Intelligence concord that sufficient safeguards are in place. The society also reduces the number of refugees admitted into the United states of america to 50,000 for FY 2017, downwardly from 110,000 set past the Obama Administration. It allows the continued processing of refugees on a "case-by-instance" basis and individuals with religious-based persecution claims, who would receive priority once the program is resumed. In addition, it suspends the resettlement of Syrian refugees indefinitely.
Response: According to security experts, refugees who enter through the US Refugee program are the most vetted entrants into the United states, going through multiple security screenings before entry into the country, a process that can take as long equally two years. Since the 9/xi attacks, the U.s. has resettled nearly 800,000 refugees through the resettlement program and none have launched a terrorist attack on United states of america soil. The conflation of refugees as threats to national security is a tactic used to reduce the number of refugees admitted to the United states. This determination will have grave ramifications worldwide, equally other nations will follow the Us' lead in abdicating their legal and moral responsibilities to refugees in the name of national security.
Banning Syrians from resettlement and suspending visa issuance to nationals of Muslim-majority nations will also certainly be used every bit a recruiting tool by terrorist groups, who will claim these measures prove that the United States is hostile to Islam. Syrian refugees are fleeing the persecution of extremist groups like ISIS and require protection equally much as any refugee group at this time.
The exception for those who face religious persecution, according to President Trump, applies to Christian minorities in the Middle East, but also, given the language, could utilise to other religious minorities, such as Rohingya in Myanmar, who are Muslim in a bulk Buddhist land. While Christian refugees in the Centre East should be protected, either in the region or in a 3rd country, it should non preclude the resettlement of Muslims, who as well are superlative targets of extremist groups. Some faith leaders in the Center Eastward, including Cosmic bishops, oppose the resettlement of their Christian populations, because they fear it volition lead to a diminishment of their local Christian communities.
The executive order on refugees, wrapped in national security language, will make the United States less secure. Information technology volition give extremist groups a propaganda tool for recruitment; encourage other nations to abdicate their responsibilities to refugees and other vulnerable populations; and will alienate millions of Muslims, both in the Usa and abroad, who otherwise would exist allies and important sources of counter-terror and police force enforcement intelligence.
The three executive orders indicate that the United States is turning its back on its heritage as an immigrant nation and a safe haven for the world's persecuted. This stance will harm its moral standing in the earth, and limit its power to influence other nations to interact with it on humanitarian and other initiatives. It volition also impairment US relations with long-term allies. Congress should resist these orders and deny funding to implement them.
The post-obit are important CMS analyses and resources on these issues, which offer an of import, show-based counter-narrative to the policies set forth in these executive orders.
President Biden'due south Executive Actions on Immigration
President Joseph R. Biden Jr. set forth an ambitious immigration calendar in the early days of the Biden-Harris administration, committing both to opposite harmful policies implemented by the Trump administration and to revitalize the Usa immigration organization more broadly. In his first 100 days in function, President Biden articulated his immigration and refugee protection goals and reversed many of his predecessor's policies in a series of executive actions. He also raised the refugee admissions cap for FY 2021 and endorsed the United states of america Citizenship Human activity of 2021, which would represent the about sweeping clearing reform legislation in decades and create the largest legalization program in Us history. President Biden's executive actions address the situation at the southern edge, root causes of irregular migration from Cardinal America, impacts of climate alter on migration, COVID-19 travel restrictions, and fortification of existing legal immigration pathways, also as commitments to create new ones.
Read More
Biden's Immigration Agenda: Immediate Actions Taken
Please bring together the Centre for Migration Studies of New York and Zolberg Plant on Migration and Mobility for a panel discussion about the Biden administration's immigration agenda on Thursday, February 4, 2021 from ii:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. (EST). This gratuitous, virtual event is open to students, researchers, and practitioners of all disciplines.
Read More than
T. Alexander Aleinikoff and Donald Kerwin
Improving the U.S. Immigration System in the First Year of the Biden Administration
The Biden assistants will face substantial challenges in putting immigration and refugee policy back on runway—not just reversing ill-advised policies of the by four years but also improving a system that was in demand of reform well earlier the current administration took office. In this newspaper, T. Alexander Aleinikoff and Donald Kerwin highlight a number of reforms that should be prioritized by the Biden administration in its first year.
...
View Publication
President Trump Bug Executive Order Temporarily Halting the Issuance of Green Cards
On Apr 22, 2020, President Donald Trump signed an executive society halting for threescore days the issuance of green cards to sure immigrants, arguing that foreign workers should not compete with US-citizen workers for jobs at a time of a public health crisis and economical downturn. Public officials and immigration advocates expressed strong opposition to the executive order, citing studies that show that immigrants overall contribute to the health of the US economy and complement, not compete with, United states of america workers.
Read More than
$2.2 Trillion Appropriations Measure to Address COVID-19 Excludes Sure Immigrants
On March 27, 2020, Congress passed and the President signed a $2.2 trillion supplemental appropriations measure, known as the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Deed (CARES, S. 3548), to provide needed assistance to a variety of sectors in the US economy, including hospitals, transportation hubs (including airlines), small businesses, families, and individuals. Immigrants, peculiarly the undocumented, were largely excluded from eligibility for aid in the package.
Read More
Michele Waslin
The Use of Executive Orders and Proclamations to Create Clearing Policy: Trump in Historical Perspective
This article examines presidential immigration policy making through executive orders (EOs) and proclamations. Information technology finds that Donald Trump'south overall volume of EOs has been remarkably similar to that of other presidents, while his number of proclamations has been relatively high. However, his immigration-related EOs and proclamations diverge from those of his predecessors in several ways. Of the 56 immigration-related EOs and 64 proclamations issued since 1945, one pct of all EOs and proclamations have been clearing related, compared to eight percent of Trump's EOs and 2.4 percentage of Trump'south proclamations. In a precipitous departure from previous presidents, a greater share of Trump'south EOs and proclamations have been substantive policy-making documents intended to restrict admissions of legal immigrants and increment enforcement along the border and in the interior of the United States. This commodity explores Trump's unorthodox use of executive tools to make clearing policy, circumventing Congress and even members of his own administration. It recommends that Congress reassert its ability over US immigration law and policy.
...
View Publication
Fiona Adamson
Trump'south Executive Orders on Migration and Security: Policy Incompetence, Political Theater or Ideological Pivot?
This essay examines the possible motives backside Trump's executive orders related to immigrants and refugees. The author considers whether the orders were issued to address policy gaps, whether they are merely political theater to appease Trump'southward voter base, and/or whether they serve a broader anti-immigrant, anti-Muslim ethno-nationalist agenda. ...
View Publication
Donald Kerwin
Treating Syrian Refugees equally a National Security Threat: Do the Means Fit the End?
In this essay, Donald Kerwin, CMS' executive director, seeks to move the nation'due south debate on the twin imperatives of national security and refugee protection beyond the electric current politically-charged and misguided dialogue on Syrian refugees....
View Publication
CMS Back Pages | Lessons from Post-9/11 Immigration-Related Security Measures
CMS Dorsum Pages seeks to depict attention to past CMS publications and research that speak to pressing public policy concerns. This post addresses the U.s. debate on national security and refugee protection. The recent terrorist attacks in Paris and San...
Read More
Donald Kerwin
How Robust Refugee Protection Policies Can Strengthen Human and National Security
This newspaper makes the case that refugee protection and national security should be viewed every bit complementary, not alien country goals. It argues that refugee protection can further the security of refugees, afflicted states, and the international customs. Refugees and international migrants tin too advance national security by contributing to a country's economical vitality, military machine strength, diplomatic continuing, and civic values. The paper identifies several strategies that would, if implemented, promote both security and refugee protection. It also outlines boosted steps that the U.s. Congress should have to raise US refugee protection policies and security. Finally, it argues for the efficacy of political engagement in support of pro-protection, pro-security policies, and against the assumption that political populism will invariably impede support for refugee protection....
View Publication
CMSOnAir | Donald Kerwin
Sep, 09 2016 Posted in CMSOnAirA few days before the 15th anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks, the Middle for Migration Studies of New York (CMS) is releasing a new in-depth report examining refugee protection and national security. The paper, titled "How Robust Refugee Protection Policies Tin Strengthen Man and National Security," is function...
View Multimedia
CMSOnAir | Secretary Michael Chertoff
Jul, 26 2016 Posted in CMSOnAirThis episode features former Secretary of the United states of america Section of Homeland Security (DHS) Michael Chertoff on the intersection between international migration, refugee protection and national security. Secretary Chertoff discusses the lessons learned from 9/eleven terrorist attacks, the security of the U.s.a. refugee resettlement and visa waiver programs, proposals to bar Muslim immigrants from admission and to build a fence the length of the US-United mexican states border, and the need for wide immigration reform.
View Multimedia
Donald Kerwin
National Identity and 3 of the Most Damaging Directives in President Trump's Executive Orders on Immigration and Refugees
Donald Kerwin, CMS' executive director, examines President Donald Trump'due south "daze and awe" strategy in the forms of multiple executive orders on immigration and refugees. Kerwin argues that these executive orders create three major risks: (i) Many of the most damaging provisions will evade scrutiny in the glare of high profile issues such every bit edifice an unnecessary and unsustainable 2,000 mile edge wall; (ii) The cynical rationale for the orders (security and safety) volition actually stick, if repeated enough times; and (3) Some portion of President Trump'southward agenda may actually be implemented at permanent cost to our nation's well-being, core values, and identity. ...
View Publication
Robert Warren, Donald Kerwin
Mass Deportations Would Impoverish US Families and Create Immense Social Costs
This newspaper provides a statistical portrait of the Us undocumented population, with an emphasis on the social and economic condition of mixed-status households – that is, households that contain a The states citizen and an undocumented resident. The study finds that mass deportations would plunge millions of Us families into poverty, cost $118 billion to intendance for U.s.-citizen children of deported parents, imperil the housing market and reduce Gross domestic product.
...
View Publication
Edge Walls, Deportations and the Final Presidential Fence
Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump clashed sharply in their final fence earlier the November 8th ballot. Below are responses to iii of Trump's immigration claims and proposals during the contend and throughout his campaign. The answers matter since both candidates...
Read More
Migration and Refugee Services/ United States Conference of Cosmic Bishops, Center for Migration Studies
Unlocking Human Dignity: A Program to Transform the US Immigrant Detention System
Unlocking Human Nobility: A Program to Transform the United states of america Immigrant Detention System addresses one of the most troubled features of the US clearing organization and highlights the need for fundamental changes to it. The study recommends that the US immigrant detention system be dismantled and replaced with a network of supervised release, case management, and community back up programs, designed to ensure court appearances. As the first pace in this process, the report urges Congress to commission a comprehensive study on the benefits, challenges, toll, and time frame for creating a ceremonious immigration detention arrangement. It likewise proposes that the administration create a total menu of court compliance programs, with varying degrees of supervision, reporting, oversight and monitoring....
View Publication
Jeremy Slack, Daniel Eastward. Martínez, Scott Whiteford, Emily Peiffer
In Damage's Manner: Family unit Separation, Immigration Enforcement Programs and Security on the US-Mexico Border
This article presents findings from the Migrant Edge Crossing Report, a random sample survey of 1,100 deported migrants in United mexican states conducted betwixt 2009 and 2012. It examines the demographics and family ties of deportees, and analyzes their experiences with the immigration enforcement practices and programs that constitute the Consequence Delivery Organisation. The article concludes that these programs—which were intended to increase the penalties associated with unauthorized migration and deter illegal entries—practise not have a strong deterrent event. The paper concludes that border enforcement practices over the past 2 decades have led to longer stays, the resulting development of potent family unit and social ties by unauthorized residents to the United states, and a greater resolve to return post-deportation, particularly by migrants with homes and families in the U.s.....
View Publication
Does the United States Need to Invest More in Border Security? Probably Not
In 1990, the total cribbing to the Clearing and Naturalization Service (INS), including for adjudication of applications, was $1.2 billion. Past 2012, appropriations to the 2 Department of Homeland Security (DHS) enforcement agencies, Community and Border Protection (CBP) and Immigration...
Read More
Walter A. Ewing
"Enemy Territory": Immigration Enforcement in the US-Mexico Borderlands
For the last two decades, immigration enforcement along the US-Mexico edge has been based focused on the strategy of "prevention through deterrence," which has been characterized by full-bodied enforcement personnel and resources directly along the edge and expanded detention and deportation of unauthorized immigrants. Despite meaning federal spending on enforcement, the number of unauthorized immigrants living in the United States has tripled since the strategy was introduced in the 1990s. "Prevention through deterrence" has also funneled more migrants into increasingly dangerous edge crossing routes and resulted in enforcement excesses by Border Patrol agents. This paper traces the evolution of US border enforcement and recommends greater accountability of enforcement officials every bit well equally shifting the focus of border security toward the apprehension of terrorists and the disruption of transnational criminal organizations. ...
View Publication
Tara Magner
Refugee, Asylum, and Related Legislation in the U.s. Congress: 2013-2016
This commodity describes the significant attempts to enact legislation related to refugees and international migrants since 2013 and examines the reasons why those attempts accept not succeeded. Information technology also describes American attitudes toward refugees and assesses whether those attitudes affected the fate of legislation....
View Publication
David Hollenbach, Due south.J.
Borders and Duties to the Displaced: Ethical Perspectives on the Refugee Protection Organization
This essay proposes some ethical perspectives that can help in the chore of reassessing the construction of the global refugee protection system in light of the extraordinarily loftier levels of refugee move and forced migration occurring today. ...
View Publication
Nicole Ostrand
The Syrian Refugee Crisis: A Comparison of Responses by Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United states of america
This paper looks at the burdens and costs of the Syrian refugee crisis and considers how they have, or have not, been shared past the international community at large, and in item by Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The degree of protection provided by the four states is pocket-sized in relation to that provided by neighboring countries to Syria, and far more than could be done. This paper also argues that the international community as a whole has not sufficiently contributed toward alleviating the burden caused by the Syrian refugee influx, in terms of both financial assistance and refugee resettlement. It puts forward 2 general recommendations to reduce the strain on neighboring countries: increase the level of brunt sharing past the international community as a whole and more evenly distribute the brunt among industrialized states in Europe, North America, and the Asia Pacific....
View Publication
Donald Kerwin
The Us Refugee Protection System on the 35th Anniversary of the Refugee Human action of 1980
In 2013, the Middle for Migration Studies of New York (CMS) initiated a project to bring concentrated bookish and policy attention to the US refugee protection system, broadly understood to encompass refugees, asylum seekers and refugee-like populations in demand of protection. The initiative gave rise to a series of papers published in 2014 and 2015, which CMS is releasing as a special drove in its Journal on Migration and Man Security on the 35th anniversary of the Refugee Act of 1980. This introductory essay situates the papers in the collection within a broader discussion of country compliance with international law, impediments to protection, US protection programs, vulnerable populations, and due process concerns. The essay sets forth all-encompassing policy recommendations to strengthen the system drawn from the papers, legislative proposals, and other sources....
View Publication
Melanie Nezer
An Overview of Pending Asylum and Refugee Legislation in the US Congress
There has been no significant legislation related to the asylum process enacted in Congress in nearly a decade. During the past several sessions of Congress, bills have been introduced that would make pregnant changes to the land's asylum laws and refugee admissions programme. This paper provides an overview of the awaiting legislation and the changes proposed. These bills demonstrate the continued interest of members of Congress in these bug and the demand for reform, and they provide an important tool for advocates for education and outreach to Congress and the public....
View Publication
Anastasia Brown, Todd Scribner
Unfulfilled Promises, Hereafter Possibilities: The Refugee Resettlement System in the United states of america
Since World War II, the Usa domestic resettlement system has evolved from one that responded to crises in an ad hoc way to one characterized by an expansive and dynamic partnership between the federal government, states and voluntary resettlement agencies. However, more than than 3 decades subsequently the passage of the Refugee Act of 1980, the plan suffers from a lack of adequate financial support for transitional assist and integration services, gaps in coordination and information sharing amid participating agencies, and a backlash confronting the programme in certain receiving communities. This paper highlights specific improvements that would address these issues and strengthen the US resettlement organisation moving frontwards....
View Publication
CMSOnAir | Fr. Thomas Reese, SJ
January, 06 2017 Posted in CMSOnAirIn this episode, Fr. Thomas Reese, SJ, chair of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), discusses violations of law and legal procedures by border officials, CBP and USCIS' reliance on virtual interviews, the importance of legal representation in aviary cases, and the detention of mothers and children. Fr. Reese also discusses the global crunch in refugee protection and the proposals to deny the admission of refugees based on organized religion and nationality.
View Multimedia
Migration Experts Series | Fr. David Hollenbach
Sep, 15 2016 Posted in Migration Experts SeriesFather David Hollenbach, Pedro Arrupe Distinguished Research Professor at Georgetown University''s School of Foreign Service and senior fellow at the Berkley Center, discusses his paper, "Borders and Duties to the Displaced: Upstanding Perspectives on the Refugee Protection Organisation."
View Multimedia
CMSOnAir | Linda Rabben on Sanctuary
November, 23 2016 Posted in CMSOnAirThis timely episode of CMSOnAir features an interview with Linda Rabben, Acquaintance Research Professor at the University of Maryland, on the refuge and protection of migrants and refugees – also known as 'sanctuary.' Professor Rabben traces sanctuary back to its organized religion traditions and examines its cardinal role in past and present movements that sought to welcome, support, shelter and advocate for vulnerable populations. Her research has just been released in a second edition of her book, Sanctuary and Asylum: A Social and Political History (Academy of Washington Press 2016) .
View Multimedia
Municipal IDs and Country and Local Measures to Regularize the Lives of the Unauthorized
In the last decade, a growing number of The states cities accept implemented municipal identification cards (IDs). Both advocates and critics call municipal IDs "documenting the undocumented."[ane] IDs enable residents to access buildings and services, just are issued past municipalities rather...
Read More
Robert Warren, Donald Kerwin
Mass Deportations Would Impoverish Usa Families and Create Immense Social Costs
This newspaper provides a statistical portrait of the United states undocumented population, with an emphasis on the social and economic condition of mixed-condition households – that is, households that incorporate a US citizen and an undocumented resident. The study finds that mass deportations would plunge millions of United states families into poverty, cost $118 billion to care for US-citizen children of deported parents, imperil the housing market and reduce Gdp.
...
View Publication
Visa Overstays and the Decline in the US Undocumented Population
On January twenty, 2016, the Center for Migration Studies of New York (CMS) released a report finding that the total undocumented population in the United states of america has declined gradually over the past few years. The solar day before, the US Department...
Read More
Robert Warren
New Data and Analysis Confirms Stable Growth in Clearing
This written report reviews the latest information available nearly the growth of the foreign-built-in population and provides information about recently arrived temporary residents in the population. The report finds that foreign-born population growth, legal and undocumented, as well as new arrivals, have remained fairly stable over the by few years....
View Publication
Surge in Immigration in 2014 and 2015? The Evidence Remains Illusory
Introduction In June 2016, the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) released a report titled "New Data: Immigration Surged in 2014 and 2015." (Camarota, 2016) The written report states that: "The number of legal and illegal immigrants settling in the state is...
Read More than
Robert Warren
The Estimated Undocumented Population is 11 Million. How Practice We Know?
The purpose of this report is to briefly draw the origin of the widely reported estimate of 11 million and to evidence why claims of much higher numbers are not credible. Thus the author addresses two questions (1) how was the eleven one thousand thousand numbers derived? (2) could the actual number be 15, 20, or even xxx meg? The author provides a simple framework for computing the guess of 11 million and the potential range of fault around each component of the estimate. ...
View Publication
Robert Warren
A New Upsurge in Unauthorized Immigration from Mexico Not Probable
On Baronial 13, the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) released a written report based on information collected in the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey (CPS). The report, available at http://cis.org/Immigrant-Population-Hits-Tape-2nd-Quarter-2015, stated: "After falling or growing little in recent years, the number of Mexican immigrants again seems to be growing significantly." The......
View Publication
Donald Kerwin, Robert Warren
Potential Beneficiaries of the Obama Administration's Executive Action Programs Deeply Embedded in US Social club
This paper offers a statistical portrait of the intended direct beneficiaries of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA), the Deferred Activeness for Childhood Arrivals (DACA), and the DACA expansion (DACA-plus) programs. It finds that potential DAPA, DACA, and DACA-plus recipients are securely embedded in United states of america society, with loftier employment rates, extensive US family ties, long tenure, and substantial rates of English-language proficiency. The newspaper besides notes various groups that would benefit indirectly from the full implementation of DAPA and DACA or, conversely, would suffer from the removal of potential beneficiaries of these programs. The authors discover these populations have go embedded in US society and that an unknown, albeit not insubstantial percentage of both the DAPA- and DACA-eligible may already qualify for an immigration benefit or relief that would put them on a path to permanent residency and Usa citizenship....
View Publication
Robert Warren
U.s.a. Undocumented Population Drops Below 11 Million in 2014, with Connected Declines in the Mexican Undocumented Population
Undocumented immigration has been a significant political upshot in recent years, and is likely to remain and so throughout and beyond the presidential ballot year of 2016. One reason for the high and sustained level of interest in undocumented clearing is the widespread belief that the tendency in the undocumented population is e'er upwardly. This paper shows that this belief is mistaken and that, in fact, the undocumented population has been decreasing for more than than a half a decade. Other findings of the paper that should inform the immigration debate are the growing naturalized denizen populations in about every The states state and the fact that, since 1980, the legally resident foreign-born population from Mexico has grown faster than the undocumented population from Mexico....
View Publication
Robert Warren, Donald Kerwin
Beyond DAPA and DACA: Revisiting Legislative Reform in Light of Long-Term Trends in Unauthorized Immigration to the United states
This paper documents dramatic changes in unauthorized immigration to the United States in the past two decades. It presents estimates of the unauthorized resident population derived from American Community Survey information, supplemented past recent estimates produced past Warren and Warren (2013), and statistics from IPUMS-United states. The paper highlights several trends that sally from this data, including the precipitous decline in arrivals into this population since 2000 (specially from Mexico), the apace increasing average length of residence of unauthorized residents, and the growing salience of visa overstays in constituting this population. The paper provides estimates of those who would be eligible for the Deferred Activity for Parental Accountability (DAPA) and Deferred Action for Babyhood Arrivals (DACA) programs. Withal information technology as well looks beyond these programs to make the example that substantial declines in the unauthorized population — a goal shared past partisans on both sides of the immigration reform debate — will require legislation that reforms the legal clearing system, legalizes a large pct of the unauthorized, and effectively responds to nonimmigrant visa overstays....
View Publication
Robert Warren
Democratizing Information virtually Unauthorized Residents in the United States: Estimates and Public-Use Information, 2010 to 2013
Information about the unauthorized resident population is needed to develop and evaluate US immigration policy, determine the social and economic effects of unauthorized clearing, and assist public and individual service providers in carrying out their missions. Until recently, estimates have been available only for selected data points at the national and sometimes the state level. The Center for Migration Studies (CMS) convened a meeting in September 2013 to appraise the need for information about the unauthorized resident population. The meeting included leading academics, researchers, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that serve immigrants, and local, land, and federal authorities representatives. Based on the recommendations from that coming together, CMS initiated a projection to derive estimates of the size and characteristics of the unauthorized population at the national, land, and sub-state levels, and to make the information readily bachelor to a wide cross-department of users. A series of statistical procedures were developed to derive estimates based on microdata collected past the US Census Bureau in the 2010 American Community Survey (ACS). The estimates provide detailed demographic information for unauthorized residents in population units equally small-scale as 100,000 persons. Overall, the estimates are consistent with the limited information produced past residual estimation techniques. A primary consideration in constructing the estimates was to protect the privacy of ACS respondents....
View Publication
CMSOnAir | Cecilia Muñoz
Nov, 29 2016 Posted in CMSOnAirCecilia Muñoz, Assistant to President Barack Obama and Managing director of the White House's Domestic Policy Quango, joins CMSOnAir to reflect on the Administration's efforts on clearing during the past eight years. She offers a candid assessment of the major immigration and refugee issues and challenges the Administration faced, from legislative reform to Executive action to immigration enforcement and national security. In this episode, Ms. Muñoz speaks with CMS's Executive Managing director Donald Kerwin on the implementation of the Deferred Action for Babyhood Arrivals (DACA) programme, Syrian refugee resettlement in the U.s., and the regime'southward response to the surge of Central American unaccompanied minors and families into the state.
View Multimedia
Alan Thou. Kraut
"Make America Great Over again"… Over again?
In this essay, Alan G. Kraut, University Professor of History at American University, traces the origin of the "Make America Great Again" slogan to nativists of the early 20th century....
View Publication
Alan M. Kraut
Nativism, An American Perennial
This essay provides a historical analysis of the nativist rhetoric that has prevailed in American politics, and which became a prominent theme in American political discourse during the 2016 presidential entrada. ...
View Publication
Using Scientific discipline to Define the Undesirable Immigrant
The Heart for Migration Studies of New York (CMS) maintains unique annal collections that certificate US immigration history and policy from the mid-19th century to the present. CMS's From the CMS Archive series attempts to apply archive records, documents, photographs and other...
Read More
Source: https://cmsny.org/trumps-executive-orders-immigration-refugees/
0 Response to "Todays Ethical Delimas With Immgration Reform in the United States Peer Reviewed Journals"
إرسال تعليق